← all drafts

Why Your City Changes Everything About Your Marketing Strategy

VidIQ evidence

Brandyn's existing take (from corpus)

> "Albuquerque is extremely offline compared to Atlanta — in Albuquerque you've got to work harder to build digital presence. Every name seems to be taken — 30% of cognitive effort goes to naming new ventures."

> "Look for local calendars and events. Reach out to event organizers — they are needy, they want to be on podcasts."

Draft LinkedIn post

The same marketing playbook doesn't work in every city.

I've worked in Atlanta and Albuquerque. What works online in one place requires twice the effort in the other.

Atlanta has a dense, active online small business community. Events get posted, shared, retweeted. Local creators have audiences. If you put decent video on Instagram and tag the right people, you get reach. The city is networked and online.

Albuquerque is a different calculation. The market is more offline. There are fewer local influencers, fewer events calendars with real traffic, fewer people actively looking for local businesses on Instagram. You can post consistently for months and wonder why nothing is moving. It's not your content. It's the infrastructure.

This matters because most marketing advice assumes you're in a dense, networked city.

"Post consistently and the algorithm will reward you" is true somewhere. But if your city hasn't built that infrastructure yet, you have to go offline to find your customers first. Reach out to the event organizers. Go to the local chamber meeting. Get in front of the one person who knows everyone.

The internet is not evenly distributed. Markets are not equally online.

If your digital presence isn't working, the first question isn't "what am I posting wrong?" It's "how online is my actual market?"

The playbook changes by geography. Nobody talks about that enough.