← all drafts ✏️ Edit in Google Docs ↗

The Garden Variety — Week 30 (Jul 27–Aug 2)

Film: Julie & Julia (2009) | CTA: Big Ticket Copywriting ($97)


Julie Powell is working a government job at Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, fielding calls from September 11 survivors trying to navigate housing assistance. She comes home every night and cooks. She decides to cook all 524 recipes in Julia Child's Mastering the Art of French Cooking in 365 days and write about it.

Her husband Eric asks who's going to read it.

Nobody, she says. That's kind of the point.


The blog runs for a year. She writes every day — late nights after the LMDC shifts, burnt bechamel, collapsed soufflés, some real wins. She writes about all of it honestly. It's specific. It's a person in a kitchen in Queens doing something difficult and reporting back.

People find it. Not immediately, not by invitation. They find it because it was there, because it was searchable, because she was actually saying something worth reading.

The New York Times covered it in 2003. Amanda Hesser, food section. After that: book deal, then the movie you can watch on a Sunday afternoon with subtitles on.

None of that was planned. It happened because the writing was public and the writing was real.


There's a parallel the film runs alongside Julie's story that I think gets missed. Julia Child's plot — working for years with Simone Beck and Louisette Bertholle on the manuscript, getting it finished, then watching publishers pass on it. Houghton Mifflin declined. It went into a drawer for a while. Eventually Knopf took it and published it in 1961. The book that's still in print, still in professional kitchens, still the one people cite when they mean "actually learning to cook" — it got rejected.

When it finally got out into the world it wasn't because Julia had done outreach campaigns or built a platform. The book existed. It was there. It got found.

Both stories are about the same thing: you put work into public, you don't control when it lands, and sometimes it lands years later and sometimes it never does. But work that stays private never lands at all.


Jane Friedman runs a newsletter about the publishing industry that a lot of writers treat as required reading. What she's been documenting for a few years now is what anyone building an audience has probably felt: the SEO-driven traffic model that powered blogs through the 2000s and 2010s is mostly gone. Algorithm traffic for independent writers has collapsed. What's actually working is direct subscription. People opting in. People choosing to stay.

Which is a weird outcome if you were betting on scale. The newsletter — small, specific, no discovery algorithm, you have to actually find it and sign up — is outperforming the blog that was supposed to reach everyone.

The reason is something like what Julie's blog was doing: it was addressed to someone. Not everyone. Someone. The reader felt they were being written to directly, not at. That specificity is the thing that makes people subscribe and stay, and it's exactly what gets smoothed away when you're writing for SEO.


Reaching out in public counts. A blog post is a cold email to a million strangers.


The writing that makes that land is the same writing that makes a warm email to a real person land. You're addressing someone who doesn't know you yet. You have one shot at the first read. Whether it's a newsletter, an essay, a blog — the craft underneath it is identical to the craft of a well-written pitch to someone already in your orbit.

Big Ticket Copywriting is $97. That's the specific thing it's about: writing that sounds like you and actually makes someone do something.

[link]


— Brandyn


Draft notes (for Brandyn review)